Why the study?
Does the combination of diltiazem and atenolol reduce blood pressure more than monotherapy or placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Does the combination of diltiazem and atenolol reduce blood pressure more than monotherapy or placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
In patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, combining diltiazem and atenolol provides fully additive blood pressure reduction without causing clinically significant cardiac conduction disturbances.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports diltiazem-atenolol combination for additive BP control in mild-moderate hypertension; confirms fully additive effects over monotherapy in this RCT.
In 15 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, the effects of diltiazem (120 mg twice daily) were compared with those of atenolol (50 mg once daily), the two drugs in combination, and placebo in a randomized double-blind cross-over study with treatment phases of 4 weeks duration. Blood pressure was reduced in the active treatment phases (supine blood pressure: diltiazem, 172/92 mmHg; atenolol, 172/92 mmHg; diltiazem plus atenolol, 164/88 mmHg; pooled estimate of s.e.m. by analysis of variance = 3/1) compared with placebo (180/101 mmHg). Factorial analysis confirmed fully additive antihypertensive effects of the drugs in combination. The time interval from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex (P-R interval) was longer during combination therapy (0.184s) compared with either diltiazem (0.175s) or atenolol (0.174s) alone, or placebo (0.164s); s.e.m. by analysis of variance = 0.003. No clinically significant conduction disturbances occurred. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide was elevated by atenolol but not diltiazem. Thus, in subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension, diltiazem and atenolol had equal antihypertensive efficacy when used alone, and fully additive effects in combination, on both blood pressure and cardiac conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tonkin et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: