Key result
Integrated bullseye model identifies optimal LV lead placement in ~95% of patients, linked to improved LVEF.
Why the study?
Does a composite bullseye plot integrating echocardiography, CT, and MRI facilitate optimal targeted left ventricular lead implantation in patients receiving CRT?
Population
39 patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy, mean age 69 ± 9.7 years, 77% male, 82% with…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
May support targeted CRT lead placement; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Observational (n=39)
Does a composite bullseye plot integrating echocardiography, CT, and MRI facilitate optimal targeted left ventricular lead implantation in patients receiving CRT?
Integrating echocardiography, cardiac CT, and MRI into a combined bullseye plot is feasible and facilitates optimal targeted left ventricular lead placement in CRT patients, leading to improved LV function at 6 months.
Bakos et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Heart failure eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=39). Integrated bullseye model combining echocardiography, cardiac CT, and MRI was evaluated on Optimal left ventricular lead placement (matching vein in the segment with the latest mechanical delay or immediately adjacent segments). An integrated bullseye model combining echocardiography, CT, and MRI identified an optimal LV lead placement site in 95% of patients, leading to improved LV ejection fraction at 6 months (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: