Key result
Platelet adhesiveness assessment using platelet-rich plasma with ADP failed to show any difference between prospective and post-infarction groups of men of the same age.
Why the study?
Does measuring platelet adhesiveness using platelet-rich plasma with ADP detect coronary-prone patients?
Population
Men, including a prospective group and a post-infarction group of the same age
Comparison
Measurement of platelet adhesiveness using… vs Prospective group compared to post-infarction…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Does not support ADP platelet adhesiveness testing for coronary risk stratification; leaves open whether refined assays may identify at-risk patients.
Observational
Does measuring platelet adhesiveness using platelet-rich plasma with ADP detect coronary-prone patients?
Assessing platelet adhesiveness using platelet-rich plasma with ADP is not a useful method for identifying patients at risk for coronary heart disease.
Helge Stormorken (1970) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease. Platelet adhesiveness assessment using platelet-rich plasma with ADP vs. Prospective vs post-infarction group was evaluated on Difference in platelet adhesiveness. Platelet adhesiveness assessment using platelet-rich plasma with ADP failed to show any difference between prospective and post-infarction groups of men of the same age.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: