The study demonstrates that basal nitric oxide release maintains vasodilator tone in canine femoral arteries, and its inhibition by L-NAME causes supersensitivity to nitrovasodilators.
Highlights basal NO tone in canine arteries; leaves open translation to human endothelial dysfunction.
Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine, and this pathway can be inhibited by various analogues of L-arginine, including NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). To investigate the role of this pathway in the regulation of femoral arterial tone, the effect of L-NAME was studied in vitro in isolated canine femoral arteries suspended in organ chambers for isometric tension recording, and in vivo in conscious dogs chronically instrumented for the measurement of iliac blood flow and iliac artery diameter. In vitro, L-NAME induced an endothelium-dependent contraction, inhibited the endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine or bradykinin, and potentiated the relaxation evoked by the nitric oxide donor SIN-1. In vivo, locally administered L-NAME induced a decrease in iliac artery diameter and an increase in iliac resistance, potentiated the iliac responses to the organic nitrate nitroglycerin, but did not affect the iliac responses to the endothelium dependent vasodilator acetylcholine. Thus, in the canine femoral vascular bed: a) basal release of nitric oxide contributes in vivo to the maintenance of a permanent vasodilator tone at the level of both large conductance and small resistance vessels; b) the endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and bradykinin in vitro are mostly mediated through the release of nitric oxide from L-arginine; c) the endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine in vivo are probably mediated by a relaxing factor distinct from nitric oxide, or by a nitric oxide-like molecule released from endothelial pools; and d) removal of the NO-mediated vasodilator tone by L-NAME leads to a supersensitivity to nitrovasodilators, both in vitro and in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: